Originally posted by newbreedbrian
well said mark. the only point i'd disagree with is that terrorism does exist. it just depends on which side of the fence you're looking at it from.
terrorism is defined as "The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property
with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons." Hmmm, sounds like
terrorism isn't so one sided after all. I can think of a pretty large example of that definition currently going on. I'd also argue that more subtle
forms of terrorism exist, such as economic sanctions (against Cuba for example). How many people does that hurt "with the intention of intimidating or
coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons". Same as security tapes showed the 9/11 bombers cleancut and dressed
well (yes they are well aware of what american perception says a terrorist looks like), so are more subtle forms of terror in foreign policy disguised
to not look so alarming to the unquestioning mind. |