XHonusWagnerX - 10-9-2006 at 08:29 AM
Im so torn on this. I hate it in theory, but sometimes I like how it looks. I have a Gorilla Biscuits shirt with the side print. I have an old Shelter
shirt print really low on one side on the front.
JawnDiablo - 10-9-2006 at 08:38 AM
i also had one of them GB shirts with the side print of the jungle dude as a youbgster
defstarsteve - 10-9-2006 at 08:53 AM
printing is no problem...
but I hate the trend
i also hate distressed printing
i spent years learning how to make good prints and now you want me to make it look fukced up'
you pay for ink on a shirt you're getting ink on shirt
CR83 - 10-9-2006 at 09:23 AM
No, they are no good.
BKT - 10-9-2006 at 10:43 AM
They are fine by me, if it is the right print and done well I think it looks really good.
MM.
joemaconmovies - 10-9-2006 at 10:55 AM
if it looks good yes, if it doesn't no
same as "normal shirts." not every design works.
tireironsaint - 10-9-2006 at 06:19 PM
I have yet to see one of those that doesn't look terrible. Most of the ones I've seen look like really fruity emo designs, but I've seen a few where
it was a good design just placed really stupidly.
XnMeX - 10-9-2006 at 09:53 PM
I'm a fan of bottom logos on hoodies. Basically, ass logos. I think it was trendy in the late ninties for about 2 seconds, but I like how it looks.
Works on T shirts as well, but I like it on a hoodie most.
GabeTexasGAMC - 10-10-2006 at 01:35 AM
i dig em!
clevohardcore - 10-10-2006 at 10:16 PM
I think it looks stupid as shit. I have that GB shirt too and it sucks. I almost returned it to the shirt guy because of it. Thought I had a mistake
shirt.
clevohardcore - 10-10-2006 at 10:17 PM
I ahve no problem with the logo centered on the bottom or whatever jsut when you put the shirt underneath and armpit or arm it looks retarded.