Thorp and Sailor's Grave Board

SAW 4

XnMeX - 10-27-2007 at 09:27 AM

Saw it last night. Me and my best friend just have a "thing" of sorts about seeing the SAW movies on opening night. We have seen them all on opening night. It was pretty good, pretty much what you would expect. The traps were good, but deffinetly not enough of them. Deeper insight into Jigsaw and whatnot.

Also, anoyne see "30 days of night" yet? It is rainy out today so I think me and the misses are gonna go see that. Cool concept (Vampires in Alaska where there is no daylight for long periods of time), and the style of it looks cool.

XHonusWagnerX - 10-27-2007 at 09:29 AM

I also saw SAW IV last night and I thought it was really good. The opening scene was great!

XnMeX - 10-27-2007 at 09:49 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by XHonusWagnerX
I also saw SAW IV last night and I thought it was really good. The opening scene was great!


INDEED! VERY well done, and it had sooo many people in the theatre gagging. Good stuff! :thumbup:

clevohardcore - 10-27-2007 at 04:10 PM

That vampire movie seems cool.

Spoiler - 10-27-2007 at 04:47 PM

I want to see them both....both the thought of going to the movie theater frightens me

I'll wait until after helloween,when the crowd dies (down)

:spin:

tireironsaint - 10-27-2007 at 08:22 PM

I could care less about seeing the new Saw, but I did go to 30 Days Of Night on opening day. I liked it a lot, although the editing job seemed pretty shitty, I'm hoping that means there's a bunch of stuff they'll throw back in for the DVD. Very cool take on the whole thing, no cheesy goth costumes or seductive tactics, just some brutal motherfuckers tearing out throats with their crazy teeth. Lots and lots of gore and some impressive effects used in some VERY brutal scenes, especially the decapitations. I can't remember another movie where you actually see someone's head chopped off all the way through from start to finish without the camera panning away and coming back to show a fake looking head. This shit looks real.

The worst thing about seeing it was the crowd. Usually I go see movies as matinees pretty early in the day and enjoy being one of three or four people in the theater. This time I went on opening night with a friend and went to what was probably the peak show time. In this town it seems like people think of movies like watching TV, the motherfuckers just talk the whole damn time and have no problem coughing in your ear for an hour before thinking of going outside. That shit ALMOST ruined the movie for me, but not quite.

clevohardcore - 10-27-2007 at 08:45 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by tireironsaint
I could care less about seeing the new Saw, but I did go to 30 Days Of Night on opening day. I liked it a lot, although the editing job seemed pretty shitty, I'm hoping that means there's a bunch of stuff they'll throw back in for the DVD. Very cool take on the whole thing, no cheesy goth costumes or seductive tactics, just some brutal motherfuckers tearing out throats with their crazy teeth. Lots and lots of gore and some impressive effects used in some VERY brutal scenes, especially the decapitations. I can't remember another movie where you actually see someone's head chopped off all the way through from start to finish without the camera panning away and coming back to show a fake looking head. This shit looks real.

The worst thing about seeing it was the crowd. Usually I go see movies as matinees pretty early in the day and enjoy being one of three or four people in the theater. This time I went on opening night with a friend and went to what was probably the peak show time. In this town it seems like people think of movies like watching TV, the motherfuckers just talk the whole damn time and have no problem coughing in your ear for an hour before thinking of going outside. That shit ALMOST ruined the movie for me, but not quite.








^^^^^^^I'm the same way. I avoid crowds when going to a movie.

JawnDiablo - 10-28-2007 at 06:03 PM

I love seeing it on a big screen, with loud volume (IMAX is killer) but I hate people.

Siczine.com - 10-28-2007 at 06:08 PM

Anyone that hates on the Saw series is a fucking tard in my book.

morgan - 10-28-2007 at 06:49 PM

Saw 4 had some pretty cool traps in it but the chronology of it was so fucked up that it was hard to follow at the end.

XHonusWagnerX - 10-28-2007 at 06:51 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by morgan
Saw 4 had some pretty cool traps in it but the chronology of it was so fucked up that it was hard to follow at the end.


I hear that! I feel like a retard when I go to a Saw movie. I can never remember who anyone is or follow the whole thing!

BKT - 10-28-2007 at 09:36 PM

I want to see both of these movies for sure.

MM.

XnMeX - 10-28-2007 at 10:44 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by XHonusWagnerX
Quote:
Originally posted by morgan
Saw 4 had some pretty cool traps in it but the chronology of it was so fucked up that it was hard to follow at the end.


I hear that! I feel like a retard when I go to a Saw movie. I can never remember who anyone is or follow the whole thing!


Thats because all we really care about is the fucked up traps.

morgan - 10-28-2007 at 11:19 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by XnMeX
Quote:
Originally posted by XHonusWagnerX
Quote:
Originally posted by morgan
Saw 4 had some pretty cool traps in it but the chronology of it was so fucked up that it was hard to follow at the end.


I hear that! I feel like a retard when I go to a Saw movie. I can never remember who anyone is or follow the whole thing!


Thats because all we really care about is the fucked up traps.


Thats the only reason I wasn't pissed as hell at the end of it.

tireironsaint - 10-29-2007 at 01:53 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Siczine.com
Anyone that hates on the Saw series is a fucking tard in my book.
Hey, fuck you too, buddy!

Blah, I just think they're boring and an obvious cash cow at this point. I found the first one mildy entertaining, but far from the brilliant new thing people were touting it as at the time. There was DEFINITELY never any reason for a sequel and there sure as fuck doesn't need to be 3, 4, and however many more times they'll milk this limp shit.

random - 10-29-2007 at 02:47 AM

I'm tempted to go see it. As for the series, I've seen 1 and 3, but I don't think I've seen 2 yet. 3 really had some potential to be an intriguing movie for a while with the debate about whether the guy could recover his humanity by forgiving/helping some people who totally ruined his life with regard to his kid... but they fucking blew it and just went for some gore at the end. But they certainly not the worst movies I've ever seen.

BKT - 10-29-2007 at 12:17 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by tireironsaint
Quote:
Originally posted by Siczine.com
Anyone that hates on the Saw series is a fucking tard in my book.
Hey, fuck you too, buddy!

Blah, I just think they're boring and an obvious cash cow at this point. I found the first one mildy entertaining, but far from the brilliant new thing people were touting it as at the time. There was DEFINITELY never any reason for a sequel and there sure as fuck doesn't need to be 3, 4, and however many more times they'll milk this limp shit.


There was indeed a reason for a sequel and a 3, 4 and so on. $$$ the same reason they made all those Halloweens, Friday the 13th's, Nightmare on Elm Street and so on. Money is always the reason and if it was going in my pocket I would find it to be the best reason in the world.

MM.

clevohardcore - 10-29-2007 at 01:09 PM

not my thing.

Murk - 11-5-2007 at 03:35 AM

i thought it was great, but not only are there still unanswered questions from #3, this one has produced an additional dozen questions.

Tobin Bell is signed on til #6.

XHonusWagnerX - 11-5-2007 at 10:28 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Murk


Tobin Bell is signed on til #6.


weird... I was wondering how they would work him into more sequals.