CR83
Moderator
    
Posts: 5221
Registered: 1-23-2004
Location: STL!
Member Is Offline
Mood: Harm's Way
|
|
Video or Camcorder- need help
We are in the market for a video camera. There are a ton to choose from. Some that make mini dvd's, they contain hard drives and others that use
mini-tapes.
Any recommendations?
|
|
|
Voodoobillyman
The Artist Formerly Known As...
   
Posts: 4247
Registered: 8-12-2005
Location: Eastern Seaboard of the United States
Member Is Offline
Mood: my daughters beautiful curiousity
|
|
I have one that uses the little tapes. Bottom line was it's cheaper. Not too much of a pain in the ass but if you have the money to spend i would go
with the dvd one.
|
|
|
CR83
Moderator
    
Posts: 5221
Registered: 1-23-2004
Location: STL!
Member Is Offline
Mood: Harm's Way
|
|
Good to know. Thanks Bud.
|
|
|
BDx13
|
|
obviously, spend some time reading through reviews at cnet.com and camcorderinfo.com.
i also recommend this site:
http://www.consumersearch.com/www/photo_and_video/digital-ca...
they pour through reviews from all over the web, then offer a quality summary and highlights.
the tape vs. dvd. vs. hard disk debate is a tough one. you really need to consider not only the limitations of each format (recording time, cost of
media), but also how you will use your footage after it's been shot.
- dvd is great cause you can throw it right into the player when you're done.
- hard disk is great for editing, cause you simply drag and drop you file to your desktop and get to work.
- if you wanna watch your footage on TV when recording with tape, you have to run a line from your camera to your tv. for editing, you have to
playback the footage so your computer can capture it. BUT, it's cheap, proven, and you can get up to 120 minutes on a tape.
If I fail math, there goes my chance at a good job and a happy life full of hard work.
|
|
|
BDx13
|
|
Afer exhaustive research, I bought the Panasonic PV-GS250 ( review, review, review ) in 2005 for three main reasons:
1. I greatly prefer the traditional, horizontal body. This camera is still small, but those super-tiny vertical models don't fit in my hand well.
2. It's a three chip camera, which will capture better color than a single chip camera.
3. It got consistantly good reviews, and fell right within my price/feature requirements.
If I fail math, there goes my chance at a good job and a happy life full of hard work.
|
|
|
BDx13
|
|
a few other thoughts...
- don't fall for that 1,000x digital zoom bullshit. digital zoom is almost completely useless. optical zoom is the only way to go if you want
footage you can actually stand watching.
- use a digital camera for stills, a digital camcorder for video. period. if you want a quality image, do not rely on a still camera for video or a
camcorder for stills. in a pinch, yeas, each can do both, but with the exception of Samsung's funny looking and now discontinued D6040, no camera can
do both well.
If I fail math, there goes my chance at a good job and a happy life full of hard work.
|
|
|
joemaconmovies
Posting Freak
   
Posts: 1827
Registered: 6-22-2005
Location: Western Mass
Member Is Offline
Mood: pissed off
|
|
i have a $3800 camcorder that uses mini dv tapes. the next step up is a hi-deg camera that uses a hard drive, no tapes. i'd go with hard drive if
you can but as duane said, research it. ones with a hard drive are nice.
|
|
|
CR83
Moderator
    
Posts: 5221
Registered: 1-23-2004
Location: STL!
Member Is Offline
Mood: Harm's Way
|
|
| Quote: | Originally posted by BD
a few other thoughts...
- don't fall for that 1,000x digital zoom bullshit. digital zoom is almost completely useless. optical zoom is the only way to go if you want
footage you can actually stand watching.
- use a digital camera for stills, a digital camcorder for video. period. if you want a quality image, do not rely on a still camera for video or a
camcorder for stills. in a pinch, yeas, each can do both, but with the exception of Samsung's funny looking and now discontinued D6040, no camera can
do both well.
|
BD, as always, THANK YOU!!!
|
|
|