Thorp and Sailor's Grave Board
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Video or Camcorder- need help
CR83
Moderator
******




Posts: 5221
Registered: 1-23-2004
Location: STL!
Member Is Offline

Mood: Harm's Way

[*] posted on 12-20-2006 at 03:24 PM
Video or Camcorder- need help


We are in the market for a video camera. There are a ton to choose from. Some that make mini dvd's, they contain hard drives and others that use mini-tapes.

Any recommendations?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Voodoobillyman
The Artist Formerly Known As...
*****


Avatar


Posts: 4247
Registered: 8-12-2005
Location: Eastern Seaboard of the United States
Member Is Offline

Mood: my daughters beautiful curiousity

[*] posted on 12-20-2006 at 03:30 PM


I have one that uses the little tapes. Bottom line was it's cheaper. Not too much of a pain in the ass but if you have the money to spend i would go with the dvd one.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
CR83
Moderator
******




Posts: 5221
Registered: 1-23-2004
Location: STL!
Member Is Offline

Mood: Harm's Way

[*] posted on 12-20-2006 at 05:11 PM


Good to know. Thanks Bud.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
BDx13
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 18115
Registered: 8-25-2004
Location: Pennsyltucky
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 12-20-2006 at 05:49 PM


obviously, spend some time reading through reviews at cnet.com and camcorderinfo.com.

i also recommend this site:
http://www.consumersearch.com/www/photo_and_video/digital-ca...
they pour through reviews from all over the web, then offer a quality summary and highlights.

the tape vs. dvd. vs. hard disk debate is a tough one. you really need to consider not only the limitations of each format (recording time, cost of media), but also how you will use your footage after it's been shot.
- dvd is great cause you can throw it right into the player when you're done.
- hard disk is great for editing, cause you simply drag and drop you file to your desktop and get to work.
- if you wanna watch your footage on TV when recording with tape, you have to run a line from your camera to your tv. for editing, you have to playback the footage so your computer can capture it. BUT, it's cheap, proven, and you can get up to 120 minutes on a tape.





If I fail math, there goes my chance at a good job and a happy life full of hard work.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
BDx13
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 18115
Registered: 8-25-2004
Location: Pennsyltucky
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 12-20-2006 at 06:09 PM


Afer exhaustive research, I bought the Panasonic PV-GS250 ( review, review, review ) in 2005 for three main reasons:

1. I greatly prefer the traditional, horizontal body. This camera is still small, but those super-tiny vertical models don't fit in my hand well.
2. It's a three chip camera, which will capture better color than a single chip camera.
3. It got consistantly good reviews, and fell right within my price/feature requirements.






If I fail math, there goes my chance at a good job and a happy life full of hard work.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
BDx13
Super Administrator
*********


Avatar


Posts: 18115
Registered: 8-25-2004
Location: Pennsyltucky
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 12-20-2006 at 06:19 PM


a few other thoughts...

- don't fall for that 1,000x digital zoom bullshit. digital zoom is almost completely useless. optical zoom is the only way to go if you want footage you can actually stand watching.

- use a digital camera for stills, a digital camcorder for video. period. if you want a quality image, do not rely on a still camera for video or a camcorder for stills. in a pinch, yeas, each can do both, but with the exception of Samsung's funny looking and now discontinued D6040, no camera can do both well.






If I fail math, there goes my chance at a good job and a happy life full of hard work.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
joemaconmovies
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1827
Registered: 6-22-2005
Location: Western Mass
Member Is Offline

Mood: pissed off

[*] posted on 12-20-2006 at 11:06 PM


i have a $3800 camcorder that uses mini dv tapes. the next step up is a hi-deg camera that uses a hard drive, no tapes. i'd go with hard drive if you can but as duane said, research it. ones with a hard drive are nice.



View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
CR83
Moderator
******




Posts: 5221
Registered: 1-23-2004
Location: STL!
Member Is Offline

Mood: Harm's Way

[*] posted on 12-21-2006 at 11:09 AM


Quote:
Originally posted by BD
a few other thoughts...

- don't fall for that 1,000x digital zoom bullshit. digital zoom is almost completely useless. optical zoom is the only way to go if you want footage you can actually stand watching.

- use a digital camera for stills, a digital camcorder for video. period. if you want a quality image, do not rely on a still camera for video or a camcorder for stills. in a pinch, yeas, each can do both, but with the exception of Samsung's funny looking and now discontinued D6040, no camera can do both well.




BD, as always, THANK YOU!!!
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB 1.9.11
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2011 The XMB Group